<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 301 Redirects don&#8217;t transfer 100% of PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Content-Driven Search Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not seen any PageRank changes on any of the domains that I look at regularly, although, it has now been quite some time since the last &quot;official&quot; PageRank update, so we likely are due one (if they don&#039;t discontinue it from being visible completely).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not seen any PageRank changes on any of the domains that I look at regularly, although, it has now been quite some time since the last &#8220;official&#8221; PageRank update, so we likely are due one (if they don&#8217;t discontinue it from being visible completely).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massagesessel</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Massagesessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-349</guid>
		<description>On October 23rd we had a pagerank change from 0 to 2 on our blog tus-hasede.blogspot.com. Maybe there has been a small update on that day or there are now just updates of single pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 23rd we had a pagerank change from 0 to 2 on our blog tus-hasede.blogspot.com. Maybe there has been a small update on that day or there are now just updates of single pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen enough instances of changing domains using 301 redirects and retention of rankings to think that 301s do pass something across - but it doesnt seem as much as in the past, and not as consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen enough instances of changing domains using 301 redirects and retention of rankings to think that 301s do pass something across &#8211; but it doesnt seem as much as in the past, and not as consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubiertas Piscinas</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Cubiertas Piscinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-347</guid>
		<description>In my experience, 301 transmits very litle page rank, if not cero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, 301 transmits very litle page rank, if not cero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Hi Malcolm,

Good point - he is specifically talking about cross domain 301 redirects, although I think that this was primarily in response to the way that the question was worded.

However, the wording of his answer: 

&quot;I can certainly see how there could be some loss of PageRank. I am not 100 percent sure whether the crawling and indexing team has implemented that sort of natural PageRank decay, so I will have to go and check on that specific case. (Note: in a follow on email, Matt confirmed that this is in fact the case. There is some loss of PR through a 301).&quot;

Whilst he was responding to a question about a particular question about domain 301 redirects, I think the explanation of the answer, and specifically &quot;natural PageRank decay&quot; suggests to me that this is probably the case with 301 redirects.

As always, Matt&#039;s answers aren&#039;t entirely clear, but I generally take what he says with a generous pinch of salt anyway. In this case however, and based upon my experience of moving pages and domains, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it applied to both situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Malcolm,</p>
<p>Good point &#8211; he is specifically talking about cross domain 301 redirects, although I think that this was primarily in response to the way that the question was worded.</p>
<p>However, the wording of his answer: </p>
<p>&#8220;I can certainly see how there could be some loss of PageRank. I am not 100 percent sure whether the crawling and indexing team has implemented that sort of natural PageRank decay, so I will have to go and check on that specific case. (Note: in a follow on email, Matt confirmed that this is in fact the case. There is some loss of PR through a 301).&#8221;</p>
<p>Whilst he was responding to a question about a particular question about domain 301 redirects, I think the explanation of the answer, and specifically &#8220;natural PageRank decay&#8221; suggests to me that this is probably the case with 301 redirects.</p>
<p>As always, Matt&#8217;s answers aren&#8217;t entirely clear, but I generally take what he says with a generous pinch of salt anyway. In this case however, and based upon my experience of moving pages and domains, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it applied to both situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/blog/301-redirects-dont-transfer-100-of-pagerank/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertical-leap.co.uk/?p=6668#comment-345</guid>
		<description>As usual with Matt&#039;s answers, it wasn&#039;t quite that clearcut... Sigh. He is specifically talking about cross-domain 301s when he mentions the loss of PR, isn&#039;t he? (The question is cross domain, and his answer is about &quot;that specific case&quot;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual with Matt&#8217;s answers, it wasn&#8217;t quite that clearcut&#8230; Sigh. He is specifically talking about cross-domain 301s when he mentions the loss of PR, isn&#8217;t he? (The question is cross domain, and his answer is about &#8220;that specific case&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

