Google the most relevant search engine? Not all the time

I’ve been checking some results pages on some terms that one of my clients targets, and was somewhat dissatisfied with the results that Google returns on these terms.

The phrases that I have been looking for here specifically were:

Alternative to cosmetic surgery
Alternative to plastic surgery

Looking at these terms, its quite clear that the searcher is NOT looking for cosmetic/plastic surgery, and the results displayed on Yahoo and MSN respectively seem to reflect that, with a few exceptions:

Yahoo:

MSN/Live:

However when it came to searching on Google, it seemed that a lot of the results being displayed were for cosmetic/plastic surgeons. This baffled me somewhat, as the search term is clearly suggesting that the user isn’t looking for someone to perform this type of procedure, and is looking for an “Alternative” – with this being a core word within the phrase. The first 2 results are relevant to the term, but most of the others on page 1 were not:

After going through some of the results pages, I noticed at the bottom of the second page a reference to the fact that that the phrase “alternative” was not actually being used in the results:

I can’t really understand why Google are doing this on this phrase. You can revise your search to include this word (putting a + in front of “alternative”), but it seems that this is an area where the searcher intent is not being properly understood and you aren’t told about the phrase alternati

Related Posts

1. Search Engine Rankings are not Enough – Does your Page Title Invoke Action?
2. Google changing your Search Automatically – Reducing Relevancy
3. Managed Search Engine Marketing – Its Creation, Its Abuse
4. Search engine newness Yahoo and MSN on keeping up with Google
5. Google improve related search suggestions
6. Is Google Really the Best Search Engine?
7. Yahoo turns 14 – how times have changed in search engine optimisation
8. Search Sponsored Links – How to review competing Google Adwords ads (PPC)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 11:29 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.